2016年高考上海卷英語試題：

　　(C)

　　Enough “meaningless drivel”. That’s the message from a group of members of the UK government who have been examining how social media firms like LinkedIn gather and use social media data.

　　The House of Commons Science and Technology Committee’s report, released last week, has blamed firms for making people sign up to long incomprehensible legal contracts and calls for an international standard or kitemark (認證標記) to identify sites that have clear terms and conditions.

　　“The term and conditions statement that we all carelessly agree to is meaningless drivel to anyone,” says Andrew Miller, the chair of the committee. Instead, he says, firms should provide a plain-English version of their terms. The simplified version would be checked by a third party and awarded a kitemark if it is an accurate reflection of the original.

　　It is not yet clear who would administer the scheme, but the UK government is looking at introducing it on a voluntary basis. “we need to think through how we make that work in practice,” says Miller.

　　Would we pay any more attention to a kitemark? “I think if you went and did the survey, people would like to think they would,” says Nigel Shadbolt at the University of Southampton, UK, who studies open data. “We do know people worry a lot about the inappropriate use of their information.” But what would happen in practice is another matter, he says.

　　Other organisations such as banks ask customers to sign long contracts they may not read or understand, but Miller believes social media requires special attention because it is so new. “We still don’t know how significant the long-term impact is going to be of unwise things that kids put on social media that come back and bite them in 20 years’ time,” he says.

　　Shadbolt, who gave evidence to the committee, says the problem is that we don’t know how companies will use our data because their business models and uses of data are still evolving. Large collections of personal information have become valuable only recently, he says.

　　The shock and anger when a social media firm does something with data that people don’t expect, even if users have apparently permission, show that the current situation isn’t working. If properly administered, a kitemark on terms and conditions could help people know what exactly they are signing up to. Although they would still have to actually read them.

　　73. What does the phrase “ meaningless drivel” in paragraphs 1 and 3 refer to?

　　A. Legal contracts that social media firms make people sign up to.

　　B. Warnings from the UK government against unsafe websites.

　　C. Guidelines on how to use social media websites properly.

　　D. Insignificant data collected by social media firms.

　　74. It can be inferred from the passage that Nigel Shadbolt doubts whether _______.

　　A. social media firms would conduct a survey on the kitemark scheme

　　B. people would pay as much attention to a kitemark as they think

　　C. a kitemark scheme would be workable on a nationwide scale

　　D. the kitemark would help companies develop their business models

　　75. Andrew Miller thinks social media needs more attention than banks mainly because _______.

　　A. their users consist largely of kids under 20 years old

　　B. the language in their contracts is usually harder to understand

　　C. the information they collected could become more valuable in future

　　D. it remains unknown how users’ data will be taken advantage of

　　76. The writer advises users of social media to _______.

　　A. think carefully before posting anything onto such websites

　　B. read the terms and conditions even if there is a kitemark

　　C. take no further action if they can find a kitemark

　　D. avoid providing too much personal information

　　77. Which of the following is the best title of the passage?

　　A. Say no to social media?

　　B. New security rules in operation?

　　C. Accept without reading?

　　D. Administration matters!

　　Section C

　　Directions: Read the passage carefully. Then answer the questions or complete the statements in the fewest possible words.

　　Walking will be banned on escalators as part of a trail designed ti reduce congestion(擁堵) at some of the country’s busiest stations.

　　In the first move of its kind, all travelers will be forced to stand on both sides of escalators on the London Underground as part of a plan to increase capacity(容量) at the height of the rush hour.

　　A xix-month trial will be introduced at Holborn station from mid-April, eliminating the rule of standing on the right and walking on the left. The move, imitating a similar structure in Far eastern cities such as Hong Kong, is designed to increase the number of people using long escalators at the busiest times . it could be expanded across the Tube network in coming years.

　　According to London Underground, only 40 percent of travelers walk the full length of long escalators, leaving the majority at the bottom as they wait to get on to the “standing “side.

　　A three-week trial at Holborn last year found that the number of people using escalators at any time of could be raised by almost a third. Peter McNaught, operations director at London Underground, said: “It may not seem right that you can go quicker by standing still, but our experiments at Holborn have proved that it can be true. This new six-month trial will help us find out if we can influence customers to stand on both sides in the long term.”

　　Holborn has one of the longest sets of escalators on the Underground network at 23.4 high. Tube bosses claim that capacity was limited because so few people wanted to walk up—meaning only one side was used at all times. Research has shown that it is more effective use of escalators over 18.5 to ban walking.

　　The previous trial found that escalators at the station normally carried 2,500 people between 8:30am and 9:30am on a typical day, rising to 3,250 during the researching period.

　　In the new trial, which will be launched from April 18, one of three “up” escalators will be standing only, with a second banning walking at peak times. A third will remain a mix of walking and standing.

　　(Note: Answering the questions the questions or complete the statements in NO MORE THAN TEN WORDS.)

　　78. What is the existing problem with standing on the right and walking on the left?

　　79. What did last year’s three-week trial at Holborn station prove?

　　80.The research suggests that walking should be forbidden on escalators that are at least _________ in height.

　　81. In the new trail, in addition to one escalator banning walking in rush hours, the other “up” escalators will be used for_________________.

　　第II卷(共47分)

　　I. Translation

　　Directions: Translate the following sentences into English, using the words given in the brackets.

　　1.我真希望自己的文章有朝一日能見報。(hope)

　　2.二十世紀末中國經濟迅速發展。(witness)

　　3.為買一雙運動鞋而通宵排隊有意義嗎?(point)

　　4.雖然當時我年幼，不理解這部電影的含義，但我記得我的家人都感動得落淚了。(too…to…)

　　5.我阿姨苦讀四年之后獲得了文憑，那一刻她欣喜萬分。(The moment…)

　　II. Guided Writing

　　Directions: Write an English composition in 120–150 words according to the instructions given below in Chinese.

　　假設你是中華中學學生姚平，最近參加了一項研究性學習調研，課題為“父母是否以子女為榮”。通過調研你校學生及其父母，結果發現雙方對此問題的看法有差異(數據如圖所示)。根據圖表寫一份報告，在報告中，你必須：

　　1. 描述調研數據;
2. 分析可能導致這一結果的原因。

　　2016年高考上海卷英語試題答案：

　　第I卷
　　第一大題第1至第10小題，每題1分;第11至第16小題，每題2分;第17題至第24題，每題1分。共30分。
　　1.D 2. B 3.A 4.B 5.D 6.C 7.B 8.C 9.C 10.A
　　11.C 12.D 13.A 14.B 15.A 16.C
　　17.Deadline 18. photos 19.stadium 20. Lunch
　　21.a(famous) judge 22.Asking for help
　　23.Having a voice 24.Sharing (with others)
　　第二大題每小題1分。共26分。
　　25. Wondering 26. what 27. which 28. had done 29. buying
　　30. Before 31. from 32. how 33. has been regarded 34. that
　　35. better 36. a 37. you 38. annoyed 39. control
　　40. to get
　　41. D 42.E 43.J 44.G 45.C 46.H 47.B 48.F 49.A 50.K
　　第三大題第51至65小題，每題1分;第66至77小題，每題2分;第78至81小題，每題2分。共47分。
　　51. D 52. A 53. B 54. D 55. C 56. B 57. A 58. D 59. A 60. C
　　61. B 62. B 63. D 64. A 65. C 66. B 67. A 68. D 69. A 70. D
　　71. D 72. B 73. A 74. B 75. D 76. B 77. C
　　第II卷
　　第一大題第1至3小題，每題4分;第4至5小題，每題5分。共22分。
　　1. I really hope that my article will be published in a newspaper someday.
　　2. The late twentieth century witnessed the rapid development of China’s economy.
　　3. What is the point of/in lining up for the whole night just to buy a pair of sports shoes? / Is there any point (in) lining up for the whole night just to buy a pair of sports shoes?
　　4. Although I was then too young to understand the meaning of the film, I remember my family
　　were moved to tears.
　　5. The moment my aunt gained her diploma after four years of hard work, she was filled with joy.
　　第二大題共25分。