D)The 1997 decision not to determine critical habitat for the jaguar was the right one, because even though they cross the border from time to time, jaguars don't occupy any territory in our country--and that probably means the environment here is no longer ideal for them.

　　E)In prehistoric times, these beautiful cats inhabited significant areas of the western United States, but in the past 100 years, there have been few, if any, resident breeding populations here. The last time a female jaguar with a cub ( 幼獸 ) was sighted in this country was in the early 1900s.

　　F)Two well-intentioned conservation advocacy groups, the Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife, sued the Fish and Wildlife Service to change its ruling. Thus in 2006, the agency reassessed the situation and again determined that no areas in the United States met the definition of critical habitat for the jaguar. Despite occasional sightings, mostly within 40 miles of the Mexican border, there were still no data to indicate jaguars had taken up residence inside the United States.

　　G ) After this second ruling was made, an Arizona rancher ( 牧場主 ), with support from the state Game and Fish Department, set infrared-camera (紅外攝像機 ) traps togather more data, and essentially confirmed the Fish and Wildlife Service's findings. The cameras did capture transient jaguars, including one male jaguar, nick named Macho, B, who roamed the Arizona borderlands for more than a decade. But Macho B, now dead, might have been the sole resident American jaguar, and his extensive travels indicated he was not having an easy time surviving in this dry, rugged region.

　　H) Despite the continued evidence, the two conservation advocacy groups continued to sue the government. Apparently, they want jaguars to repopulate the United State seven if jaguars don't wan! to. Last March, a federal district judge in Arizona ordered the Fish and Wildlife Service to revisit its 2006 determination on critical habitat.

　　I)The facts haven't changed: there is still no area in the United States essential to the conservation of the jaguar. But, having asserted this twice already, the service, nowunder a new president, has bent to the tiresome litigation (訴訟). On Jan. 12, Fish and Wildlife officials, claimed to have evaluated new scientific information that had become available after the July 2006 ruling. They determined that it is now prudent to appoint critical habitat for the jaguar in the United States.

　　J)This means that Fish and Wildlife must now also formulate a recovery plan for the jaguar. And since jaguars have not been able to reestablish themselves naturally over the past century, the government will likely have to go to significant expense to attempt to bring them back--especially if the cats have to be reintroduced.

　　K)So why not do everything we can, at whatever cost, to bring jaguars back into the United States? To begin with, the American Southwest is, at best, marginal habitat for the animals. More important, there are better ways to help jaguars. South of our border, from Mexico to Argentina, thousands of jaguars live and breed in their true critical habitat. Governments and conservation groups (including the one I head) are already working hard to conserve jaguar populations and connect them to one another through an initiative called the Jaguar Corridor.

　　L).The jaguars that now and then cross into the United States most likely come from the northernmost population of jaguars, in Sonora, Mexico. Rather than demand jaguars return to our country, we should help Mexico and other jaguar-range countries conserve the animals' true habitat it

　　M )The recent move by the Fish and Wildlife Service means that the rare federal funds devoted to protecting wild animals will be wasted on efforts that cannot help save jaguars. It also stands to weaken the Endangered Species Act, because if critical habitat is redefined as any place where a species might ever have existed, and where you or I might want it to exist again, then the door is open for many other sense less efforts to bring back long-lost creatures.

　　N)The Fish and Wildlife officials whose job is to protect the country's wild animals need to grow a stronger backbone--stick with their original, correct decision and save their money for more useful preservation work. Otherwise, when funds are needed to preserve all those small, ugly, non-charismatic endangered species at the back of the line, there may be no money left.

　　1. It is still a fact that there is no suitable place for jaguars to live safely in the United States.

　　2. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service should be more determined and saving for the conservation work.

　　3. Jaguars were regarded as endangered species because of their rare appearance at the United States-Mexico border.

　　4. Money was not spent effectively in helping save jaguars in the recent move by the Fish and Wildlife Service.

　　5. It can be inferred that the United States is not the best choice for jaguars to live from the evidence that they don't settle anywhere here.

　　6. South of the United States' border, from Mexico to Argentina, is the true critical habitat for jaguars.

　　7. The number of jaguars breeding populations in significant areas of the western United States has deceased in the past century.

　　8. It is necessary for the government to invest lots of funds in order to help jaguars to reestablish.

　　9. It didn't indicate that jaguars had settled down in the United States even though they were seen within 40 miles of the Mexican border at times.

　　10. Fish and Wildlife officials were sure enough to appoint critical habitat for the jaguar in the United States.

　　1.I)。【題干譯文】這仍然是一個事實：在美國沒有合適的地方讓美洲虎安全地 生存。

　　【定位】由題干中的still a fact和no suitable place定位到原文I)段第一句：11lefacts haven’t changed：there is still no area in the United States essential to the conservation of the jaguar.

　　【精解】原文中的the facts haven’t changed對應題干中的it is still a fact，原文中的no area in the United States essential to the conservation of the jaguar對應題干中的no suitable place for jaguars to live safely in the United States，因此原文定位句和題干是同義轉述，故選I)。

　　2.N)?！绢}干譯文】美國魚類和野生動物服務中心應該更加堅定并且為保護工作節約開支。

　　【定位】由題干中的determined and saving for the conservation work定位到原文N)段第一句：The Fish and Wild Life officials whose job is to protect the country's wild animals need to grow a stronger backbone——stick with their original.correct decision and save their money for more useful preservation work.

　　【精解】定位句表明美國魚類和野生動物服務中心需要堅持他們最初的正確的決定并且為更為重要的美洲虎保護工作節省資金。題于中的be more determined對應原文中的9row a stronger backbone，故選N)。

　　3.C)?！绢}干譯文】由于在美國和墨西哥邊境的稀少出現，美洲虎被認為是一種瀕危物種。

　　【定位】由題干中的regarded as endangered species定位到原文c)段第一句：…the Fish and Wildlife Service put the jaguar on the United States endangered species list，because there had been occasional sightings of the cats crossing north over the United States.Mexico border.

　　【精解】定位句表明，美國魚類和野生動物服務中心將美洲虎列到瀕危物種名單，因為它們很少出現在美國和墨西哥邊境。定位句是主動語態，題于巾是被動語態，但它們是同義轉述，故c)為答案。

　　4.M)?！绢}干譯文】美國魚類和野生動物服務中心在最近行動中并沒有將資金有效地利用在保護美洲虎上。

　　【定位】由題干中的in the recent move by the Fish and Wildlife Service定位到原文M)段第一句：The recent move by the Fish and Wildlife Service means that the rare federal funds devoted to protecting wild animals will be wasted on efforts that cannot help save jaguars.

　　【精解】由定位句可知，美國魚類和野生動物服務中心的最近行動意味著致力于保護野生動物的稀有的聯邦資金被浪費了。題干中的not spent effectively“(資金)沒有被有效利用”與此為同義轉述，故M)為答案。

　　5.D)?！绢}干譯文】美洲虎并未長期定居在美國境內，通過這一證據可以推斷美國并非是它們棲息的最好環境。

　　【定位】由題干中的the best choice for jaguars to live定位到原文D)段：…jaguars don’t occupy any territory in our country--and that probably means the environment here is no longer ideal for them.

　　【精解】題干中的the best choice與原文中的ideal屬于同義轉述，題干中的don’t settle anywhere here與原文中的don’t occupy any territory in our country也屬于同義轉述，故D)為答案。

　　6.K)。【題干譯文】美國邊境以南，從墨西哥到阿根廷，是美洲虎真正的危急棲息地。

　　【定位】由題干中的from Mexico to Argentina定位到原文K)段第四句：South of our border.from Mexico to Argentina，thousands of jaguars live and breed in their true critical habitat.

　　【精解】題干中的from Mexico to Argentina和原文中的一樣，原文意思是美洲虎在這些地點繁衍生息，也就是它們真正的危急棲息地，故K)為答案。

　　7.E)?！绢}干譯文】在美國西部的重要區域繁衍生息的美洲虎的數目在近一個世紀以來減少了。

　　【定位】由題干中的breeding populations定位到原文E)段第一句：In prehistoric times.these beautiful cats inhabited significant areas of the western United States，but in the past l00 years。there have been few，if any，resident breeding populations here.

　　【精解】定位句表明，在史前時代，美洲虎尚且棲息在美國西部的重要區域，而在近一百年間，卻寥寥無幾。由此可知，在美國西部的重要區域繁衍生息的美洲虎的數目減少了，故E)為答案。

　　8.J)。【題干譯文】政府很有必要投入資金來幫助美洲虎重建柄息地。

　　【定位】由題干中的help jaguars to reestablish定位到原文J)段第二句：And since jaguars have not been able to reestablish themselves naturally over the past century，the government will likely have to go to significant expense to attempt to bring them back.

　　【精解】原文定位句的意思足“由于過去一個世紀以來，美洲虎無法憑借自己的力量壯大族群，政府需要投入巨大的資金來幫助它們。’題干和原文中都出現了reestablish“恢復，重建”，且題干中的It is necessary for the government to invest lots of funds與原文中的the government will likely have to go to significant expense屬于同義轉換，故J)為答案

　　9.F)。【題干譯文】即使在墨西哥邊境40英里以內偶爾發現了美洲虎的蹤跡，也不能表明美洲虎已經在美國棲息了。

　　【定位】由題干中的within 40 miles of the Mexican border定位到原文F)段第三句：Despite occasional sightings，mostly within 40 miles of the Mexican border，there were still no data to indicate jaguars had taken up residence inside the United States.

　　【精解】題干中的even though they were seen…at times與定位句中的Despite occasional sightings屬于同義轉述，題干中的It didn’t indicate that…與原文巾的there were still no data to indicate也屬于同義轉述，故F)為答案。

　　10.I)。【題干譯文】美國魚類和野生動物服務中心對于在美國境內指定美洲虎的危急棲息地非常確信。

　　【定位】由題干中的appoint critical habitat for the jaguar in the United States定位到原文I)段第四句：They determined that it is now prudent to appoint critical habitat for the jaguar in the United States.

　　【精解】題干中和原文定位句中都出現了同一短語appoint critical habitat for the jaguar in the United States，且題干中的Sure enough和原文中的determined為同義轉述.故I)為答案。